Just yesterday I was trying to get a bot working on the TextSecure platform.
Just yesterday I was trying to get a bot working on the TextSecure platform. A vastly disappointing experience: almost not existing libraries, sparse and incomplete documentation, unstable protocol breaking without any kind of notice ( https://github.com/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/6 , for example). And still no way to register without a phone, which would be amazing for this kind of project: https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/issues/1085 I think Telegram is succeeding in what TextSecure is failing: attracting a widespread community of developers. This is only a confirmation, in my opinion. EDIT: and, by the way, while Telegram security is no good, I wonder why we cannot have both (security & developer-friendliness)
Posted by gioi on Jun 24, 2015, 7:15 PM
Tags
Related issues
- That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
- Why is there no link to the source?
- Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
- Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
- Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
- I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.5,500 issues0 comments
hackernews (Software)
That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
Why is there no link to the source?
Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Why is there no simple workaround for this?
I have been using https://github.com/jacktasia/dumb-jump to quickly jump to definitions.
Just yesterday I was trying to get a bot working on the TextSecure platform.
Just yesterday I was trying to get a bot working on the TextSecure platform. A vastly disappointing experience: almost not existing libraries, sparse and incomplete documentation, unstable protocol breaking without any kind of notice ( https://github.com/JavaJens/TextSecure/issues/6 , for example). And still no way to register without a phone, which would be amazing for this kind of project: https://github.com/WhisperSystems/TextSecure/issues/1085 I think Telegram is succeeding in what TextSecure is failing: attracting a widespread community of developers. This is only a confirmation, in my opinion. EDIT: and, by the way, while Telegram security is no good, I wonder why we cannot have both (security & developer-friendliness)
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.