What a waste of time.
What a waste of time. Yes, specialists can squeeze the last performance improvements in ASM compared to C. Doesn't mean that -O2/-O3, auto-vectorizing can't do a nice job and get to 90% of that Optimizing DO matter. Just compare -O0 and -O1. Really. It's not because CPUs are fast that people shouldn't do that and compilers shouldn't optimize a bare minimum. It's even better that the compiler do that because ASM optimizing by hand is very error prone. And compilers get better every day. Just look at LLVM.
Posted by raverbashing on Apr 18, 2015, 6:50 AM
Tags
Related issues
- That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
- Why is there no link to the source?
- Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
- Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
- Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
- I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.7,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Software)
That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
Why is there no link to the source?
Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Why is there no simple workaround for this?
I have been using https://github.com/jacktasia/dumb-jump to quickly jump to definitions.
What a waste of time.
What a waste of time. Yes, specialists can squeeze the last performance improvements in ASM compared to C. Doesn't mean that -O2/-O3, auto-vectorizing can't do a nice job and get to 90% of that Optimizing DO matter. Just compare -O0 and -O1. Really. It's not because CPUs are fast that people shouldn't do that and compilers shouldn't optimize a bare minimum. It's even better that the compiler do that because ASM optimizing by hand is very error prone. And compilers get better every day. Just look at LLVM.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.