Why is there no documented formula to convert to from this color space?
Why is there no documented formula to convert to from this color space? A quick google and the best I could find is this Gist[0]. Searching for Oklab has a Wikipedia page[1]. [0] https://gist.github.com/dkaraush/65d19d61396f5f3cd8ba7d1b4b3... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklab_color_space
Posted by karmakaze on Aug 25, 2025, 1:27 PM
Tags
Related issues
- That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
- Why is there no link to the source?
- Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
- Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
- Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
- I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.2,000 issues0 comments
hackernews (Software)
That isn't really relevant for the tool starting the container.
NewWhy is there no link to the source?
Something I wonder about in this domain is if this is the fault of the language.
Namespace pollution is an annoying problem in Rust.
Currently, no language ports of Timefold Solver are planned.
I agree with you, almost all .NET code I write is within the .NET framework, yet when I look at C# repos, it's disheartening to see so ma...
Why is there no simple workaround for this?
I have been using https://github.com/jacktasia/dumb-jump to quickly jump to definitions.
Why is there no documented formula to convert to from this color space?
Why is there no documented formula to convert to from this color space? A quick google and the best I could find is this Gist[0]. Searching for Oklab has a Wikipedia page[1]. [0] https://gist.github.com/dkaraush/65d19d61396f5f3cd8ba7d1b4b3... [1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oklab_color_space
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.