My experience with Scala IDE: - Yes, it's very slow.
My experience with Scala IDE: - Yes, it's very slow. - Refactoring is limited, will sometimes refuse to happen, and will sometimes randomly move 1 character into the wrong place in the file. So yes it does "break", but not in a way that's hard to fix. - Variable inspection when debugging has always worked fine for me. - Scala-IDE never gives a "full" spurious compilation error (one that shows up in the problems tab and with a full icon on the left) - or rather, no more than Eclipse in Java does (the kind where you have to refresh / clean the project do sometimes happen). On some constructs it will show a spurious "presentation" compiler error (red underline, simpler icon on the left), but it's easy to visually tell the two apart. I never think code is broken when it isn't. - Autocomplete never stops working. It does sometimes get slow (several seconds) - I have automatic compilation on save (no incremental config), manual/explicit saving. It's a workflow I'm happy with.
Posted by lmm on Feb 5, 2015, 8:47 PM
Tags
Related issues
- [BUG] Cowork (Windows): all Plan9 shares fail with "Plan9 mount failed: invalid argument" after Windows update KB5124008 (26200.9445) — uninstalling the KB fixe
- Feature Request: Auto-resume CLI session when usage limit resets
- Please deobfuscate the Python
- [Bug] MLX version of Gemma 4 26B fails to load: "Model type gemma4 not supported" (macOS)
- # 233 Developers Discussed Abandoning the Office Add-in Platform — An Open Letter on the Office.js Stability, Security & Trust Crisis
- [FEATURE] Allow users to configure which shell the Bash tool uses or inherit initial shell
Raise real-world problems, find people facing the same issue, and discuss solutions.8,000 issues0 comments
reliability (Software)
[BUG] Cowork (Windows): all Plan9 shares fail with "Plan9 mount failed: invalid argument" after Windows update KB5124008 (26200.9445) — uninstalling the KB fixe
Feature Request: Auto-resume CLI session when usage limit resets
Please deobfuscate the Python
[Bug] MLX version of Gemma 4 26B fails to load: "Model type gemma4 not supported" (macOS)
# 233 Developers Discussed Abandoning the Office Add-in Platform — An Open Letter on the Office.js Stability, Security & Trust Crisis
[FEATURE] Allow users to configure which shell the Bash tool uses or inherit initial shell
Admin Materials and Surfaces
AMD Support
My experience with Scala IDE: - Yes, it's very slow.
My experience with Scala IDE: - Yes, it's very slow. - Refactoring is limited, will sometimes refuse to happen, and will sometimes randomly move 1 character into the wrong place in the file. So yes it does "break", but not in a way that's hard to fix. - Variable inspection when debugging has always worked fine for me. - Scala-IDE never gives a "full" spurious compilation error (one that shows up in the problems tab and with a full icon on the left) - or rather, no more than Eclipse in Java does (the kind where you have to refresh / clean the project do sometimes happen). On some constructs it will show a spurious "presentation" compiler error (red underline, simpler icon on the left), but it's easy to visually tell the two apart. I never think code is broken when it isn't. - Autocomplete never stops working. It does sometimes get slow (several seconds) - I have automatic compilation on save (no incremental config), manual/explicit saving. It's a workflow I'm happy with.
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Start the discussion.